Brandon Nakashima vs Maximilian Marterer Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nakashima vs Marterer analysis and find out who is favored!
Brandon Nakashima vs Maximilian Marterer Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Nakashima 1 - 1 Marterer
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nakashima has won 56.47% of points on his second serve, while Marterer has won 49.82%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nakashima, in recent form, has won 47.87% of his opponent's second serve points, while Marterer has won 49.83%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.64% and 25.52% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nakashima has saved 68.2% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Marterer has saved 57.35% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nakashima has won 61.73% of matches played (W/L 50/ 31), with Marterer winning 59.7% (W/L 40/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nakashima has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 72% (W/L 54/ 21), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 29/ 26). Marterer has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 69/ 46), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 52% (W/L 13/ 12).
- Player level: In the last year, Nakashima has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 75.61% of matches (W/L 31/ 10), where as Marterer has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 72.41% of matches (W/L 21/ 8). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Nakashima winning 1 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Nakashima winning 3 and Marterer winning 3. The last match between Nakashima and Marterer was at the Danderyd Challenger, 19-11-2023, Final, I.hard with Maximilian Marterer getting the victory 2-6 6-4 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:2:27.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nakashima and Marterer have played a deciding set 2 times, with Nakashima winning 1 times and Marterer 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Nakashima winning 0, and Marterer 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nakashima has played against opponents with an average rank of 238.2 while Marterer has played against players with an average rank of 262.49.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nakashima has won 43% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Marterer has won 44% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nakashima has converted 34.29% of breakpoint opportunities, and Marterer has converted 39.62% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
7
Total
0
Mast
4
Chall
0
Slam
1
Main
2
Minor
84
Rank
43
High
22
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor1
0
Grass0
101
Rank
45
High
28
Age
L
Plays
15
Total
0
Mast
9
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
6
Minor
Form
62% (193-120)
Career Total W/L
59% (384-264)
71% (35-14)
YTD W/L
33% (7-14)
$1,758,985
Career Prize Money
$1,642,050
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Brandon Nakashima | Maximilian Marterer |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
Sets Won | 3 | 3 |
Games Won | 31 | 27 |
Aces (Total) | 14 | 18 |
DFs (Total) | 3 | 5 |
Avg Match Time | 2:2:27 | 2:2:27 |
1st Serve % | 64% (103/162) | 56% (105/186) |
1st Serve Win% | 79% (81/103) | 80% (84/105) |
2nd Serve Win% | 54% (32/59) | 41% (33/81) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 38% (6/16) | 21% (3/14) |
Return Points W% | 37% (69/186) | 30% (49/162) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2-6 6-4 6-3 |
Maximilian Marterer
Player
Brandon Nakashima
52%
(
48 of
92)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
80)
9
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
2
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
36 of
47)
48%
(
21 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
34 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
27 of
80)
85
Total Points Won
87
|
||||
6-7(1) 6-2 6-4 |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Maximilian Marterer
68%
(
56 of
82)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
94)
6
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
3
80%
(
45 of
56)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
47 of
57)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
37)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
22 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
94)
95
Total Points Won
81
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Brandon Nakashima | Maximilian Marterer |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 71% (35/14) | 33% (7/14) |
Sets Win/Loss | 66% (74/38) | 39% (19/30) |
Games Win/Loss | 54% (620/520) | 47% (225/252) |
Hard Win/Loss | 73% (11/4) | 38% (3/5) |
Clay Win/Loss | 68% (13/6) | 40% (4/6) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 73% (11/4) | 0% (0/3) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.65 | 0.4 |
Aces Total | 363 | 94 |
DFs per game | 0.13 | 0.21 |
DFs Total | 72 | 50 |
Avg Match Time | 1:51:49 | 1:47:46 |
Avg Opp Rank | 279.71 | 210.14 |
1st Serve % | 65% (2321/3596) | 63% (956/1510) |
1st Serve W% | 75% (1739/2321) | 68% (650/956) |
2nd Serve W% | 56% (720/1275) | 50% (276/554) |
BPs Won% Total | 34% (108/315) | 40% (42/106) |
Return Pts W% | 37% (1395/3761) | 35% (518/1460) |
Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 50% (1/1) |
Masters W/L | 64% (7/4) | 33% (2/4) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 67% (4/2) | 27% (3/8) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 77% (23/7) | 50% (1/1) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 70% (33/47) | 33% (6/18) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 50% (1/2) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 63% (17/27) | 38% (3/8) |
Deciding Set W% | 64% (9/14) | 33% (2/6) |
1st set W, W | 91% (32/29) | 83% (6/5) |
1st set W, L | 9% (32/3) | 17% (6/1) |
1st set L, W | 31% (16/5) | 13% (15/2) |
Brandon Nakashima Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Nicolas Moreno De Alboran
67%
(
71 of
106)
1st Serve %
61%
(
78 of
127)
13
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
4
85%
(
60 of
71)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
49 of
78)
69%
(
24 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
22 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
52 of
127)
136
Total Points Won
97
|
6-1 6-7(6) 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Francesco Passaro
Player
Brandon Nakashima
58%
(
63 of
108)
1st Serve %
63%
(
64 of
101)
8
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
81%
(
51 of
63)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
49 of
64)
53%
(
24 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
33 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
34 of
101)
109
Total Points Won
100
|
7-6(2) 6-7(7) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Mariano Navone
63%
(
62 of
99)
1st Serve %
70%
(
64 of
92)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
39%
(
39 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Yoshihito Nishioka
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
56
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Miomir Kecmanovic
Player
Brandon Nakashima
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
73%
(
19 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
26%
(
16 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Jesper De Jong
49%
(
42 of
85)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
98)
6
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
42 of
59)
70%
(
30 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
26 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
37 of
98)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Nerman Fatic
53%
(
39 of
74)
1st Serve %
65%
(
56 of
86)
3
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
6
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
41 of
56)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
20 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Francisco Comesana
64%
(
65 of
101)
1st Serve %
70%
(
57 of
82)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
41 of
57)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
37%
(
37 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
28 of
82)
92
Total Points Won
91
|
7-5 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
QF |
Roman Safiullin
Player
Brandon Nakashima
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
46 of
77)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
77%
(
17 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
77)
75
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Pedro Martinez Portero
56%
(
61 of
108)
1st Serve %
69%
(
68 of
99)
16
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
40 of
68)
38%
(
18 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
46%
(
50 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
48 of
99)
106
Total Points Won
101
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Maximilian Marterer Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Maximilian Marterer
Player
Jordan Thompson
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
91)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
70%
(
19 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
35%
(
7 of
20)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
20 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
49 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Yannick Hanfmann
Player
Maximilian Marterer
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve %
49%
(
21 of
43)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
65%
(
15 of
23)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
38%
(
12 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
40
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 0-1 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Maximilian Marterer
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Maximilian Marterer
Player
Richard Gasquet
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
10
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
92%
(
11 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
7 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
18 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Maximilian Marterer
Player
Andrea Picchione
65%
(
62 of
95)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
87)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
81%
(
50 of
62)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
34%
(
32 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
87)
97
Total Points Won
85
|
4-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Giulio Zeppieri
Player
Maximilian Marterer
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
75%
(
46 of
61)
8
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
0
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
20 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
22 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Felix Auger Aliassime
Player
Maximilian Marterer
60%
(
72 of
120)
1st Serve %
68%
(
79 of
116)
11
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
78%
(
56 of
72)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
55 of
79)
54%
(
26 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
38 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
38 of
116)
120
Total Points Won
116
|
6-7(5) 7-6(6) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Christopher O'Connell
Player
Maximilian Marterer
50%
(
42 of
84)
1st Serve %
65%
(
62 of
95)
5
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
43 of
62)
57%
(
24 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
30 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
95)
91
Total Points Won
88
|
7-5 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Dominic Thiem
Player
Maximilian Marterer
61%
(
52 of
85)
1st Serve %
62%
(
59 of
95)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
7
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
31 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
44 of
95)
98
Total Points Won
82
|
6-1 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 | w/o | H2H |
view more